Helical vs Conventional CT in Routine Head Imaging. A Comparison of Dose and Image Quality using VGC Analysis

  • M D
  • A F
  • K S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Citation: Dousi M, Fatsi A, Sotirakou K, Gkatzia N, Patelarou M, Theodosiou A. Helical vs Conventional CT in Routine Head Imaging. A Comparison of Dose and Image Quality using VGC Analysis. Journal of Radiology and Clinical Imaging 4 (2021): 036-049. Abstract Purpose: To compare and evaluate the sequencial and helical head CT imaging acquisition nodes in terms of patient dose and image quality. Material and Methods: Sixty patients were studied in total for one week from July 2018 to July 2019 and all underwent two head CT exams. The first time a conventional technique was used and the other one the helical technique. Scan parameters and dose indices were recorded on a checklist at the end of each examination. The images were rated by three radiologists according to the criteria of the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. Results: Mann-Whitney U test showed that both dose indicators CTDI vol and DLP were statistically higher (p<0.05) in helical (Mean CTDI vol =34.15, Mean DLP=532.47) than in conventional scanning mode (Mean CTDI vol =31.73, Mean DLP=464.91). According to our

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

M, D., A, F., K, S., N, G., M, P., & A, T. (2021). Helical vs Conventional CT in Routine Head Imaging. A Comparison of Dose and Image Quality using VGC Analysis. Journal of Radiology and Clinical Imaging, 04(01). https://doi.org/10.26502/jrci.2809041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free