The role of definitive chemoradiotherapy versus surgery as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma

14Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and esophagectomy as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal cancer. Methods: To assess both strategies, the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Thirteen studies (N=2071; dCRT=869 and surgery=1202) were included. In all, 90.39% of the patients were diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Results: The 2-year (OR=1.199, 95% CI 0.922-1.560; P=0.177) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (OR=0.947, 95% CI 0.628-1.429; P=0.796) were not significantly different. No significant differences were identified in the 2-year OS among patients with stage I disease (OR=1.397, 95% CI 0.740-2.638; P=0.303) or stage II-III (OR=0.418, 95% CI 0.022-7.833; P=0.560). Patients with lymph node metastases tended to have a better 5-year OS when treated with dCRT than with surgery (OR=0.226, 95% CI 0.044-1.169; P=0.076); however, the difference between the two methods was not significant. Western patients who received dCRT had poorer prognoses than patients who underwent surgery (OR=1.522, 95% CI 1.035-2.238; P=0.033). dCRT and surgery led to similar 5-year progression-free survival rates (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.79-1.42; P=0.70). Conclusions: dCRT and surgery are equally effective as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results apply primarily to Asian populations as they have an increased incidence of ESCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, M. W., Gao, X. S., Gu, X. B., Xie, M., Cui, M., Zhang, M., … Chen, L. Q. (2018). The role of definitive chemoradiotherapy versus surgery as initial treatments for potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1470-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free