Individuals’ perceptions of health and well-being in the context of stereotactic radiosurgery for benign brain tumour: A longitudinal qualitative investigation

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Treatment-related outcomes after Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) for benign brain tumour are well-established; yet patient reported outcomes have been largely overlooked. This study explored individuals’ perspectives of their health and well-being prior to and following GKSRS. Method: Twenty adults (65% female) aged 24–71 years with benign brain tumour were recruited from a major metropolitan hospital and assessed approximately one week prior to, two weeks after, and at three months following GKSRS. They completed telephone-based interviews focusing on general health, symptoms, and well-being. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three major themes characterized individuals’ perceptions of their health and well-being. “Understanding my Illness and Treatment” reflected individuals’ efforts to make sense of their illness and symptoms to reduce ambiguity and increase sense of control. “Experiencing Gamma Knife” related to expectations of the procedure, outcomes, daily impacts, and emotional reactions. “Adjusting one’s Mindset and Coping” characterised how peoples' approaches to coping with their illness were altered over time. Conclusions: Coping and adjustment is highly individualistic in the context of GKSRS. Over time, most individuals were able to make sense of their illness, adjust their mindset and utilize behavioural strategies and support systems to cope with the long-term effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicol, C., Pinkham, M. B., Lion, K., Foote, M., McBean, A., Higgins, M., … Ownsworth, T. (2024). Individuals’ perceptions of health and well-being in the context of stereotactic radiosurgery for benign brain tumour: A longitudinal qualitative investigation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 34(2), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2023.2181190

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free