Research methodological issues in evaluating herbal interventions

10Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials provide the best evidence, and is seen as the gold standard for allopathic research. Herbal therapies are not an integral part of conventional care although they are still used by patients in their health care management. These medicines need to be subjected to rigorous research to establish their effectiveness and safety. Clearly defined treatments are required and should be recorded in a manner that enables other suitably trained researchers to reproduce them reliably. Quality control of herbal products is also a prerequisite of credible clinical trials. Methodological strategies for investigating the herbal interventions and the issues regarding appropriate patient selection, randomization and blinding, placebo effects and choice of comparator, occupational standardization and the selection of appropriate study endpoints to prove efficacy are being discussed. This paper will review research options and propose some suggestions for future research design. © 2010 Bansal et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bansal, D., Hota, D., & Chakrabarti, A. (2010). Research methodological issues in evaluating herbal interventions. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials. https://doi.org/10.2147/oajct.s9029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free