Not All Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Mutations Predict Poor Survival in Patients With Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis

4Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the characteristics of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations and investigated whether all KRAS mutations predict poor prognosis in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods: Correlations between KRAS-mutation status and clinicopathological characteristics of 93 patients with unresectable CRLM at our institution between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of KRAS mutations. Results: KRAS were primarily single-point mutations, identified in 41.9% of patients. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS. Patients with mutant KRAS had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with wild-type KRAS. Moreover, patients with codon 12 mutations had worse OS and PFS than those with wild-type KRAS, whereas mutations in codon 13 were not associated with a worse prognosis. Among the 5 most common mutations in codons 12, G12V, and G12D were associated with worse OS, furthermore, G12C mutation seemed to associated with worse PFS than patients with wild-type KRAS. Conclusion: KRAS codon 12 mutations were predictive for a poor prognosis in patients with unresectable CRLM. G12D and G12V mutations were associated with worse OS, whereas G12C mutation seemed to be associated with decreased PFS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, Z., Liu, Y., Cai, S., Yang, C., Zhou, L., & Li, W. (2021). Not All Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Mutations Predict Poor Survival in Patients With Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338211039131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free