On some "disadvantages" of the population approach

15Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a seminal article on population pharmacokinetic modeling, researchers demonstrated how means and variances of pharmacokinetic parameters for a patient population could be inferred from sparse data collected under conditions of routine patient care. But they also identified 4 potential concerns about their methodology: unobserved confounding variables may bias the inferences; conditions under which data are collected may lead to inaccuracies of reporting or recording; correlations among important predictor variables may reduce statistical efficiency; and costs cannot be controlled by principles of study design. Experiences are reviewed that relate to these potential disadvantages. A method is presented for diagnosing the possible presence of confounding. A model is constructed and applied that captures the influences of data inaccuracies. An example of selecting from among correlated covariates is summarized. Finally, a methodology for optimal study design is reviewed and applied to an example. Copyright ©2003. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nedelman, J. R. (2005). On some “disadvantages” of the population approach. AAPS Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1208/aapsj070238

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free