Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide scientific evidence regarding the effects of training on respiratory muscle training’s impact with the PowerBreath®. A systematic analysis based on the PRISMA guides and a conducted research structured around the bases of Web of Science, Scopus, Medline/PubMed, SciELO y Cochrane Library Plus. Six articles published before January 2021 were included. The documentation and quantification of heterogeneity in every meta-analysis were directed through Cochran’s Q test and the statistic I2; additionally, a biased publica-tion analysis was made using funnel plots, whose asymmetry was quantified Egger’s regression. The methodological quality was assessed through McMaster’s. PowerBreath® administering a ≥ 15% resistive load of the maximum inspiratory pressure (PIM) achieves significant improvements (54%) in said pressure within 4 weeks of commencing the inspiratory muscle training. The maximal vol-ume of oxygen (VO2max) considerable enhancements was achieved from the 6 weeks associated with the maximum inspiratory pressure ≥ 21.5% post inspiratory muscle training onwards. Con-versely, a significant blood lactate concentration decrement occurred from the 4th week of inspira-tory muscle training, after a maximum inspiratory pressure ≥ 6.8% increment. PowerBreath® is a useful device to stimulate sport performance and increase pulmonary function.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Fernández-Lázaro, D., Gallego-Gallego, D., Corchete, L. A., Fernández Zoppino, D., González-Bernal, J. J., García Gómez, B., & Mielgo-Ayuso, J. (2021, July 1). Inspiratory muscle training program using the powerbreath®: Does it have ergogenic potential for respiratory and/or athletic performance? a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136703
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.