Abstract
Aim: This study assesses the impact of surface treatment with sandblasting and Z-primer on the adhesion efficacy of fixed lingual retainers. Materials and methods: Dead soft stainless steel wire 0.016 × 0.022-inch (n = 120) was treated by different techniques and classified into four groups equally (n = 30) according to surface treatment. Group I wire without treatment, group II wire treated with sandblasting, group III wire treated with Z-primer alone, and group IV wire treated with sandblasting with Z-primer. The stainless steel wire (n = 40) was bonded to 80 extracted premolars in pairs mounted in acrylic. Other stainless steel wires (n = 80) are embedded into acrylic blocks. All groups were divided into two subgroups according to thermocycling teeth samples were assessed by shear bond strength (SBS) A stereomicroscope was used to calculate the adhesive remnant index (ARI), while the acrylic block was by pull-out test. Finally, data were analyzed by IBM-SPSS (V 27, 2020). Mann–Whitney U-test; Kruskal–Wallis H-test and, two-way ANOVA were utilized to assess for SBS and pull-out. Results: Kruskal–Wallis H-test showed a non-significant difference in ARI between all groups, while in two-way mixed ANOVA demonstrated a significant difference in SBS between group III (sandblasting/Z-primer) vs group I and group IV Z-primer (p = 0.028) and control (p = 0.016), and a significant difference between group II sandblasting vs both group I and group IV Z-primer (p = 0.024) and control (p = 0.014). The two-way mixed ANOVA tests showed a significant difference in pull-out between sandblasting/Z-primer vs Z-primer (p = 0.012). Conclusion: Using of mixed surface treatment for fixed retainer as sandblasting with Z-primer is considered as the best method to increase adhesion efficacy between wire and composite and improve the quality of orthodontics fixation when compared with single treatment (sandblasting alone or Z prime). On the other hand, the sue of sandblasting alone for fixed retainer surface treatment is better than Z-primer alone but both treatments are better than fixed retainer without treatment. Clinical application: Developed and examined new and traditional techniques used to treat the surface of wire used as a retainer after orthodontics treatment to improve patients’ treatment and life quality and decrease the chance of relapse.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Naji, S. M., Mohammad, M. H., Enan, E. T., & Tawfik, M. A. (2024). Different Wire Surface Treatments on Adhesion Efficacy of Orthodontic Fixed Retainer: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 25(7), 677–683. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3726
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.