Suggestions for health information technology trials for respiratory disorders in low- and middle-income country settings: What can we learn from trials in high-income country settings?

8Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Health Information Technology (HIT) is sometimes seen as a silver bullet for human resource, medical and economic challenges facing health systems. The evidence supporting widespread use of HIT is, however, still patchy and inconsistent. In this Perspective piece, we seek to interpret and draw key lessons from a selection of illustrative trials in developed countries with robust health-care settings in respiratory medicine that failed to demonstrate effectiveness, and offer suggestions to maximise the chances of success in subsequent HIT deployments. Particularly low- and middle-income countries, with relatively weak health infrastructures and limited health care, propose considerable room for improvement. Early experiences of studying HIT thus far in high-income country settings suggest that this process should preferably begin with trials of low-cost, well-established technologies in patient groups with a moderate burden of disease while carefully evaluating patient safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chavannes, N. H., Du Puy, R. S., & Bai, C. (2015). Suggestions for health information technology trials for respiratory disorders in low- and middle-income country settings: What can we learn from trials in high-income country settings? Npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 25. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2015.45

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free