On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton's cosine versus the Jaccard index

204Citations
Citations of this article
193Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The debate about which similarity measure one should use for the normalization in the case of Author Co-citation Analysis (ACA) is further complicated when one distinguishes between the symmetrical co-citation - or, more generally, co-occurrence - matrix and the underlying asymmetrical citation-occurrence-matrix. In the Web environment, the approach of retrieving original citation data is often not feasible. In that case, one should use the Jaccard index, but preferentially after adding the number of total citations (i.e., occurrences) on the main diagonal. Unlike Salton's cosine and the Pearson correlation, the Jaccard index abstracts from the shape of the distributions and focuses only on the intersection and the sum of the two sets. Since the correlations in the co-occurrence matrix may be spurious, this property of the Jaccard index can be considered as an advantage in this case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free