Evaluating the efficacy and safety of letermovir compared to valganciclovir for the prevention of human cytomegalovirus disease in adult lung transplant recipients

19Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk for severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Off-label use of letermovir (LET) may avert myelotoxicity associated with valganciclovir (VGCV), but data in lung transplantation are limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LET prophylaxis among lung transplant recipients. Methods: This retrospective, matched cohort study included lung transplant recipients who received LET for primary CMV prophylaxis following VGCV intolerance. Patients were matched 1:1 to historical VGCV controls based on age, serostatus group, and time from transplant. The primary outcome was CMV breakthrough within 1 year post-LET initiation; secondary outcomes included hematologic changes. Results: A total of 124 lung transplant recipients were included per group (32% CMV mismatch, D+R-), with LET initiated a median of 9.6 months post-transplantation. One CMV breakthrough event (0.8%) was observed in the LET group versus four (3.2%) in the VGCV group (p =.370). The median (interquartile range) white blood cell (WBC) count was 3.1 (2.1–5.6) at LET initiation which increased to 5.1 (3.9–7.2) at the end of follow-up (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martinez, S., Sindu, D., Nailor, M. D., Cherrier, L., Tokman, S., Walia, R., & Goodlet, K. J. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy and safety of letermovir compared to valganciclovir for the prevention of human cytomegalovirus disease in adult lung transplant recipients. Transplant Infectious Disease, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free