Evaluation of fracture resistance of indirect composite resin crowns by cyclic impact test:Influence of crown and abutment materials

12Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of abutment materials on the fracture resistance of composite crowns for premolars. Composite crowns were fabricated using two different indirect composite resin materials (Meta Color Prime Art or Estenia C&B) and cemented onto either a metal (Castwell M.C. 12) or composite resin (Build-It FR and FibreKor) abutment with resin cement (Panavia F2.0). Twenty-four specimens were fabricated for four groups (n=6 each) and subjected to 280-N cyclic impact loading at 1.0 Hz. The number of cycles which caused the composite crown to fracture was defined as its fracture resistance. All data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and the Bonferroni test (α=0.05). Composite crowns cemented onto resin abutments showed higher fracture resistance than those cemented onto metal abutments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakoguchi, K., Minami, H., Suzuki, S., & Tanaka, T. (2013). Evaluation of fracture resistance of indirect composite resin crowns by cyclic impact test:Influence of crown and abutment materials. Dental Materials Journal, 32(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-313

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free