Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Wallstent: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the indication, presentation, demographics, Stanford classification, technical efficacy, morbidity, mortality and long term patency of Wallstent for superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of literature in Pubmed and Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library in accordance to PRIMSA was conducted. Retrieval and extraction was performed by two independent reviewers with inter-rater reliability test. The hierarchy of the evidence was assessed through the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Checklist. Data was subjected to pooled prevalence analysis, Cox regression, Kaplan-Meir survival and test of probability using log rank analytics. This review is registered with International prospective register of systematic review: CRD42021271009. Results: A total of n=701 individuals with n=930 stents with median age of 60 (interquartile range (IQR): 26-89) years and male predominance 3.5 : 1 were identified in n=30 articles. The most common venographic classification was Stanford type II (n=344, 50%) and complete symptomatic resolution was achieved in 48 h. The 30-day morbidity was (n=62, 8%) and mortality was (n=21, 3%). Female gender was associated with higher 30-day morbidity (p<0.03). The cumulative median patency of Wallstent for non-malignant aetiology was [550 days (IQR: 14-1080) vs. 120 days (IQR: 0-925)] for malignancy (p<0.03). Conclusion: The use of Wallstent for resolution of malignancy induced SVC syndrome as a first line therapy is feasible and associated with low mortality. Their use for non-malignant aetiology demands a more in depth review and advocates further investigation.