Correlation between the Expression of PD-L1 and Clinicopathological Parameters in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

27Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous group of tumors with no estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Cerb-B2/HER2 expression. Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a transmembrane protein located on both non-tumor and tumor cells and it has been shown to be associated with the escape of tumor cells from the immune system. PD-L1-targeted therapy alone or in combination is now an alternative strategy in several aggressive tumor types. In this respect, TNBC is a potential candidate having limited treatment options and poor outcome. Material and Methods: Sixty-one breast cancers with no expression of ER, PR and Cerb-B2/HER2 were chosen to study PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 staining and its correlation with main clinicopathological parameters were evaluated. Results: The percentage of PD-L1 positivity was 37.7% and 47.5% in tumor and tumor microenvironment, respectively. The positivity rate was higher in breast carcinomas with medullary features (83.3%) and metaplastic carcinoma (66.6%) subgroups. PD-L1 expression of tumors was positively correlated with their Ki-67 score and PD-L1 positivity of the tumor microenvironment. No significant relationship was found between the other variables. Conclusion: PD-L1 expression rate was remarkable both in the tumor and the tumor microenvironment of TNBCs. Larger cohorts of TNBC are required to further describe their PD-L1 expression characteristics and help standardize PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays in these tumors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doğukan, R., Uçak, R., Doğukan, F. M., Tanık, C., Çitgez, B., & Kabukcuoğlu, F. (2019). Correlation between the Expression of PD-L1 and Clinicopathological Parameters in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients. European Journal of Breast Health, 15(4), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejbh.2019.4912

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free