Modeling hard and soft facts for SMEs: Some international evidence

9Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper asks how well the use of quantitative and qualitative variables can improve the assessment of companies' creditworthiness and how this result can be influenced by the economic and financial peculiarities of countries. We harden qualitative variable measures to model soft information aimed at scoring microfirms, small, and medium-sized firms. The structural survey covers Germany, Italy, and the UK in a sample of about 17 thousand companies observed during the financial crisis. Soft facts are determined within the balanced scorecard framework in order to find out the impact of customers, business processes, learning and growth, and financial perspectives. Our findings show that credit models integrating soft variables optimize the risk estimation, but estimates are country-specific and should be tailored to the characteristics of each economic system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matthias, M., Giammarino, M., & Gabbi, G. (2019). Modeling hard and soft facts for SMEs: Some international evidence. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 30(3), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free