Kinetic serum creatinine assays. II. A critical evaluation and review.

  • Bowers L
  • Wong E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We have evaluated the Technicon AutoAnalyzer method, the Beckman Creatinine Analyzer II, DuPont aca, Electro-Nucleonics GEMSAEC, and Instrumentation Laboratory Model 916 kinetic methods for determination of serum creatinine. These methods, which involve the Jaffé reaction, all showed a statistically significant proportional error relative to an ion-exchange pretreatment method for creatinine in 92 serum samples; the GEMSAEC method also showed a bias. The positive interference of several acid metabolites was quantitated in each of the methods. The evidence indicates that bilirubin, although associated with a negative creatinine interference, is not the sole interferent. We determined the magnitude of this interference and studied several methods for minimizing it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowers, L. D., & Wong, E. T. (1980). Kinetic serum creatinine assays. II. A critical evaluation and review. Clinical Chemistry, 26(5), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.5.555

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free