Magnetic resonance imaging findings often do not distinguish between people with and without low back pain (LBP). However, there are still a large number of people who undergo magnetic resonance imaging to help determine the etiology of their back pain. Texture analysis shows promise for the classification of tissues that look similar, and machine learning can minimize the number of comparisons. This study aimed to determine if texture features from lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging differ between people with and without LBP. In total, 14 participants with chronic LBP were matched for age, weight, and gender with 14 healthy volunteers. A custom texture analysis software was used to construct a gray-level co-occurrence matrix with one to four pixels offset in 0° direction for the disc and superior and inferior endplate regions. The Random Forests Algorithm was used to select the most promising classifiers. The linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to compare groups (pain vs. pain-free) at each level controlling for age. The Random Forest Algorithm recommended focusing on intervertebral discs and endplate zones at L4-5 and L5-S1. Differences were observed between groups for L5-S1 superior endplate contrast, homogeneity, and energy (p =.02). Differences were observed for L5-S1 disc contrast and homogeneity (p
CITATION STYLE
Abdollah, V., Parent, E. C., Dolatabadi, S., Marr, E., Croutze, R., Wachowicz, K., & Kawchuk, G. (2021). Texture analysis in the classification of T2-weighted magnetic resonance images in persons with and without low back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 39(10), 2187–2196. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24930
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.