Difficulty-as-Improvement: The Courage to Keep Going in the Face of Life’s Difficulties

16Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

When a task or goal is hard to think about or do, people can infer that it is a waste of their time (difficulty-as-impossibility) or valuable to them (difficulty-as-importance). Separate from chosen tasks and goals, life can present unchosen difficulties. Building on identity-based motivation theory, people can see these as opportunities for self-betterment (difficulty-as-improvement). People use this language when they recall or communicate about difficulties (autobiographical memories, Study 1; “Common Crawl” corpus, Study 2). Our difficulty mindset measures are culture-general (Australia, Canada, China, India, Iran, New Zealand, Turkey, the United States, Studies 3–15, N = 3,532). People in Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic (WEIRD)-er countries slightly agree with difficulty-as-improvement. Religious, spiritual, conservative people, believers in karma and a just world, and people from less-WEIRD countries score higher. People who endorse difficulty-as-importance see themselves as conscientious, virtuous, and leading lives of purpose. So do endorsers of difficulty-as-improvement—who also see themselves as optimists (all scores lower for difficulty-as-impossibility endorsers).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yan, V. X., Oyserman, D., Kiper, G., & Atari, M. (2024). Difficulty-as-Improvement: The Courage to Keep Going in the Face of Life’s Difficulties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(7), 1006–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231153680

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free