Clinical value of ct for differentiation between ascites and hemorrhage: An experimental in-vitro study

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Abdominal trauma, leading to intra-abdominal bleeding, is a life-threatening condition that might need emergency surgical intervention. Sonography and Computed Tomography (CT) are most commonly used to detect free intra-abdominal fluid. This study investigates the accuracy of CT to distinguish between ascites and intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Methods: Ascites were collected during a clinical routine. Three serial dilutions, mixing ascites with whole blood samples of the patient and with two blood group identical donors, were prepared. Laboratorychemical analysis and radiological evaluation using CT with measurement of average Hounsfield Units (HU) were performed. Results: Between ascites and whole blood as well as between ascites and the 1:1-ratio-samples, HU values differed significantly (p < 0.001). All further dilutions showed HU values with no significant difference compared to ascites (p ≥ 0.42). Whole blood showed significantly higher HU values than ascites and every step of the serial dilutions (p < 0.001). Measured HU values were also dependent on time and the exact point of measurement in the micro reaction vessels. Conclusions: In patients suffering from blunt abdominal trauma with preexisting ascites, HU values in CT imaging are not valid enough to exclude an acute hemorrhage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kerschbaum, M., Schurr, L. A., Riedl, M., Mayr, A., Weiß, I., Klute, L., … Dendl, L. M. (2021). Clinical value of ct for differentiation between ascites and hemorrhage: An experimental in-vitro study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free