Does an Orphan Drug Policy Make a Difference in Access? A Comparison of Canada and Australia

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Canada has been discussing whether to implement an orphan drug policy for more than 25 years. Recently, the federal government announced funding for orphan drugs starting in 2022, and the Canadian Senate has recommended that the country develop an orphan drug policy. This paper uses a list of orphan drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration between 2008 and 2017, inclusive. It then compares Canada, which has no orphan drug policy, and Australia, which has had such a policy since 1997. There was no difference between the countries in the proportion of orphan drugs approved, the time drugs spent in the regulatory review process, and any delay in marketing the drugs in the respective countries compared to the United States. Both Canada and Australia approved virtually all of the drugs that offered a moderate to significant therapeutic improvement. If Canada hopes to provide faster access to orphan drugs, especially those that are therapeutically innovative, it will need to develop a policy that is significantly different from that in Australia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lexchin, J., & Moroz, N. (2020). Does an Orphan Drug Policy Make a Difference in Access? A Comparison of Canada and Australia. International Journal of Health Services, 50(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731419886526

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free