Why cutting respiratory CO 2 loss from crops is possible, practicable, and prudential

  • Joshi J
  • Amthor J
  • McCarty D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Plants release back to the atmosphere about half of the CO 2 they capture by photosynthesis. Decreasing the rate of crop respiration could therefore potentially increase yields, store more carbon in the soil and draw down atmospheric CO 2 . However, decreasing respiration rate has had very little research effort compared to increasing photosynthesis, the historically dominant metabolic paradigm for crop improvement. Conceptual and technical advances, particularly in protein turnover and directed enzyme evolution, have now opened ways to trim the large fraction of respiration that fuels proteome maintenance by lowering the breakdown and resynthesis rates of enzymes and other proteins. In addition to being theoretically possible and practicable, exploring the reduction of respiration is prudential, given that it (i) has barely yet been tried and (ii) could help meet the challenges of sustaining crop productivity and managing atmospheric carbon.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, J., Amthor, J. S., McCarty, D. R., Messina, C. D., Wilson, M. A., Millar, A. H., & Hanson, A. D. (2023). Why cutting respiratory CO 2 loss from crops is possible, practicable, and prudential. Modern Agriculture, 1(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/moda.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free