Posterior capsular opacification and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates with the iMics Y-60H and Micro AY intra-ocular lenses: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial

14Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between two microincision intra-ocular lenses (IOLs) 3 years after surgery. Methods Sixty-five patients randomly received a Y-60H IOL (HOYA Surgical Optics, Singapore) in one eye and a Micro AY IOL (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) in the contralateral eye during same-day bilateral cataract surgery. Eyes were examined 1 week, 20 months and 3 years after surgery. The amount of PCO (score: 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (aqua). Additionally, the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate was noted. Results Three years postoperatively, the objective PCO score of Y-60H IOLs was 1.9 ± 1.7 compared to PCO score of 1.7 ± 2.2 for the Micro AY IOLs (p = 0.66). Thirty-four percentage of the Y-60H eyes had undergone Nd:YAG capsulotomy, compared to 49% of the Micro AY eyes (p = 0.04). Significantly, more capsular folds were observed in the Y-60H IOL group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity, rhexis/IOL overlap and anterior capsule opacification 3 years after surgery. Conclusion Both microincision IOLs showed high YAG rates and comparable PCO scores 3 years after surgery. In the light of this unsatisfying PCO performance, the advantage of the present microincision IOLs over conventional IOLs must be questioned.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schriefl, S. M., Leydolt, C., Stifter, E., & Menapace, R. (2015). Posterior capsular opacification and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates with the iMics Y-60H and Micro AY intra-ocular lenses: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93(4), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free