The wetting agent required for swarming in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium is not a surfactant

46Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the abilities of media from agar plates surrounding swarming and nonswarming cells of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to wet a nonpolar surface by measuring the contact angles of small drops. The swarming cells were wild type for chemotaxis, and the nonswarming cells were nonchemotactic mutants with motor biases that were counterclockwise (cheY) or clockwise (cheZ). The latter strains have been shown to be defective for swarming because the agar remains dry (Q. Wang, A. Suzuki, S. Mariconda, S. Porwollik, and R. M. Harshey, EMBO J. 24:2034-2042, 2005). We found no differences in the abilities of the media surrounding these cells, either wild type or mutant, to wet a low-energy surface (freshly prepared polydimethylsiloxane); although, their contact angles were smaller than that of the medium harvested from the underlying agar. So the agent that promotes wetness produced by wild-type cells is not a surfactant; it is an osmotic agent. Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, B. G., Turner, L., & Berg, H. C. (2007). The wetting agent required for swarming in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium is not a surfactant. Journal of Bacteriology, 189(23), 8750–8753. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01109-07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free