Monetary union in West Africa: Who might gain, who might lose, and why?

81Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We develop a model in which governments' financing needs exceed the socially optimal level because public resources are diverted to serve the narrow interests of the group in power. From a social welfare perspective, this results in undue pressure on the central bank to extract seigniorage. Monetary policy also suffers from an expansive bias, owing to the authorities' inability to precommit to price stability. Such a conjecture about the fiscal-monetary policy mix appears quite relevant in Africa, with deep implications for the incentives of fiscally heterogeneous countries to form a currency union. We calibrate the model to data for West Africa and use it to assess proposed ECOWAS monetary unions. Fiscal heterogeneity indeed appears critical in shaping regional currency blocs that would be mutually beneficial for all their members. In particular, Nigeria's membership in the configurations currently envisaged would not be in the interests of other ECOWAS countries unless it were accompanied by effective containment on Nigeria's financing needs. © Canadian Economics Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Debrun, X., Masson, P., & Pattillo, C. (2005). Monetary union in West Africa: Who might gain, who might lose, and why? Canadian Journal of Economics, 38(2), 454–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00288.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free