Prevalence and timing of prenatal ultrasound findings in cytomegalovirus-infected pregnancies

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the prevalence and timing of prenatal neurosonographic abnormalities after primary cytomegalovirus seroconversion by the first trimester of pregnancy. The additional value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the correlation between cytomegalovirus viral load in amniotic fluid and adverse neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Material and Methods: A retrospective study between 2006 and 2022 examined data from 440 women with amniocentesis for periconceptional and first-trimester cytomegalovirus seroconversion. Cases with positive amniocentesis and subsequent follow-up were included. Prenatal neurosonography, MRI, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Out of 190 women included, 37% (n = 70) presented with a normal neurosonography. Patients exhibiting abnormal neurosonography findings showed higher viral loads in amniotic fluid compared to those with a normal neurosonography (p = 0.002). In 26% (n = 49) the first abnormal ultrasound sign was already picked up at amniocentesis, and the most common ones were echogenic bowels (49%) and periventricular echogenicity (43%). With increasing gestational age, the likelihood of a new abnormal neurosonography finding decreases. MRI discovered additional abnormalities in 14% (n = 10). Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of combining diagnostic modalities, from amniocentesis to biweekly ultrasound monitoring and subsequent MRI evaluation, to capture the chronological progression and subsequent outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van den Eede, E., De Keersmaecker, B., Lagrou, K., Van der Veeken, L., Vanwinkel, S., Vangoitsenhoven, M., … De Catte, L. (2025). Prevalence and timing of prenatal ultrasound findings in cytomegalovirus-infected pregnancies. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 104(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.15018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free