Comparison of three methods for extraction of mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis dna for polymerase chain reaction from broth-based culture systems

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Conventional and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used to measure the recovery of DNA from Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) extracted with 3 different methods (MagMAXTM, DNeasyH, and phenol-chloroform) after growth in a broth-based culture system. Of the 304 samples tested, bacterial DNA was detected in 197 (65%) of samples after MagMAX, 156 (51%) after phenol-chloroform, and 123 (40%) after DNeasy extractions. By acid-fast stain, 177 (58%) of the samples yielded acid-fast-positive bacilli, of which 4 were PCR negative by the 3 extraction methods. The results demonstrated that the amplifiable MAP DNA, as evidenced by the number of PCR-positive cultures and amplicon intensity on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel, was best for MagMAX, intermediate for phenol-chloroform, and least for DNeasy. When subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction, the MagMAX extracts produced the best results, thereby making it an excellent kit for the efficient extraction of MAP DNA from the broth-based culture system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okwumabua, O., Shull, E., O’Connor, M., Moua, T. V., Danz, T., & Strelow, K. (2010). Comparison of three methods for extraction of mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis dna for polymerase chain reaction from broth-based culture systems. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 22(1), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871002200111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free