Prevalence of Barrett’s epithelium shown by endoscopic observations with linked color imaging in subjects with different H. pylori infection statuses

19Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective This study was conducted to clarify the prevalence of short segment Barrett’s esophagus (SSBE) using endoscopic observations with linked color imaging (LCI). In addition, the relationship between the presence of Barrett’s epithelium (BE) and the status of H. pylori infection was investigated. Methods The study subjects were 3,353 individuals (2,186 men, 1,167 women; mean age 55.2±9.4 years old) whose status of H. pylori infection had been determined. An endoscopic observation using LCI was performed to examine the distal margin of palisade vessels and confirm the area of BE. The prevalence of BE ! 5 mm in length was investigated. Results BE was diagnosed in 1,884 (56.2%) subjects, with lengths of <10, 10-19, 20-29, and !30 mm found in 1,005, 851, 27, and 1, respectively. Its prevalence in H. pylori-negative, H. pylori-positive, and post-eradicated subjects was 41.7%, 64.4%, and 69.9%, respectively (p<0.001). The duration since successful eradication of H. pylori did not affect the prevalence of BE. The degree of gastric mucosal atrophy was higher in cases with BE (p<0.001), although negativity for H. pylori infection and mild gastric mucosal atrophy were significant factors for the development of longer BE. Conclusion A high prevalence of SSBE was noted when LCI was used to determine the area of BE, as the distal end of the palisade vessels was easily visualized. Negativity for H. pylori infection and mild gastric mucosal atrophy were not correlated with SSBE prevalence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adachi, K., Ishimura, N., Kishi, K., Notsu, T., Mishiro, T., Sota, K., & Ishihara, S. (2021). Prevalence of Barrett’s epithelium shown by endoscopic observations with linked color imaging in subjects with different H. pylori infection statuses. Internal Medicine, 60(5), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5676-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free