Linguistic injustice and global english: Some notes from its role in academic publishing

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the position of English as the main language of international research publishing has become a growing source of language ideological debates within academia and most notably, of course, amongst Applied Linguists. In very short terms, there seems to exist a division between those who regard English as an agent of linguistic injustice for multilingual scholars, versus those who would place more emphasis on other, non-linguistic factors in accounting for the injustices perceived to exist in the publishing enterprise. In this article, summarising some of my own recent work on this topic, I suggest that looking at the issue as an 'either-or' is not only not useful, but it can also be counterproductive for our analyses. Instead, I propose we need to look at the question of English for research publication purposes as a 'both-and', meaning that both linguistic and non-linguistic factors have to be taken into consideration, and I sketch some ideas as to how that can be done.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Soler, J. (2020). Linguistic injustice and global english: Some notes from its role in academic publishing. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(3), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.575

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free