The impact of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphisms on post-stroke naming in aphasia

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Post-stroke aphasia, or language deficits after stroke, afflicts 20–30% of survivors and often persists into the chronic phase. The protein brain-derived neurotrophic factor has been identified as important for neuroplasticity, and is regulated by the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene. A patient’s brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype may influence their post-stroke aphasia recovery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a single nucleotide polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene, rs6265, on language recovery. We hypothesized that individuals with the most common polymorphism would exhibit better chronic naming performance and a more favorable recovery trajectory from poor acute performance to strong chronic outcomes compared to those without the polymorphism. We retrospectively analyzed data from 77 participants with post-stroke aphasia from three recent or ongoing studies that included both repeated standardized picture naming assessments in the acute, subacute, and chronic phases and brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotyping. Statistical analyses controlled for acute performance and lesion volume when evaluating the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype on the probability of better chronic language recovery (Aim 1) and on the probability of a person with poor acute performance later having strong performance in the subacute to chronic period (Aim 2). Results indicated that those with the most common polymorphism had a 33% higher likelihood of high naming scores in the chronic phase compared to those with the with less common polymorphisms (with a methionine allele). Individuals with the typical polymorphism whose acute naming was below average after stroke exhibited a 24% higher likelihood of recovering to be above average. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor status was not a significant independent predictor of outcome in either model. Our results suggest that the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphisms on chronic post-stroke aphasia recovery is, at best, modest and underscores the importance of individualized approaches to neurorehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Randighieri, M., Devine, A., Kelly, L., Tilton-Bolowsky, V., Neal, V., Kang, J., … Stockbridge, M. D. (2025). The impact of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphisms on post-stroke naming in aphasia. PLOS ONE, 20(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free