The ever-ending geography of international law: The changing nature of the international system and the challenge to international law: A reply to Daniel Bethlehem

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Daniel Bethlehem makes a convincing case in 'The End of Geography' that the growing challengesof our contemporary world require a move from our state-centred international legalsystem. This reply places Bethlehem's voice among a growing list of those who either describeor prescribe a move from the traditional Westphalian state system. It argues, however, thatthe challenges have always been transboundary and that the Westphalian state system hasnever been as strong or as long-lived as envisaged by its critics. © The Author, 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Landauer, C. (2014). The ever-ending geography of international law: The changing nature of the international system and the challenge to international law: A reply to Daniel Bethlehem. European Journal of International Law, 25(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free