National surveys of UK and Italian neonatal units highlighted significant differences in the use of non-invasive respiratory support

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: This study compared how non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) was provided in neonatal units in Italy and the UK. Methods: An NRS questionnaire was sent to tertiary neonatal centres, identified by national societies, from November 2015 to May 2016. Results: Responses were received from 49/57 (86%) UK units and 103/115 (90%) Italian units. NRS was started in the delivery room by 61% of UK units and 85% of Italian units. In neonatal intensive care units, 33% of UK units used nasal high-flow therapy (HFT) as primary support, compared to 3% in Italy. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was used in 57% of UK units and 90% of Italian units. The commonest starting flow rate on nasal HFT for term and preterm infants was 6 L/min in the UK, while Italian units mainly used this flow for term infants. In the UK, 67% of units decreased nasal HFT by 1 L/min per day. In Italy, infants on nasal CPAP were weaned by 1 cm H 2 O per day in 39% of units. Conclusion: The way that NRS was managed for very preterm infants differed between the UK and Italy, reflecting a lack of evidence on optimal NRS and the use of local protocols.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bresesti, I., Zivanovic, S., Ives, K. N., Lista, G., & Roehr, C. C. (2019). National surveys of UK and Italian neonatal units highlighted significant differences in the use of non-invasive respiratory support. Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics, 108(5), 865–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free