Subsequent therapies post-afatinib among patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC in LUX-Lung (LL) 3, 6 and 7

  • Sequist L
  • Wu Y
  • Schuler M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acquired resistance after front‐line treatment (tx) with 1st‐/2nd‐generation EGFR TKIs necessitates further therapies for pts with EGFRm+ NSCLC. We explored the outcome of subsequent therapies, including other EGFR TKIs and chemotherapy (CT) after 1st‐line afatinib in the LL3, 6 and 7 randomised trials. Methods: We retrospectively assessed subsequent therapy outcomes in pts with common EGFR mutations, who were randomised to 1st‐line afatinib in the LL3/6/7 trials. Data had been prospectively collected as study follow‐up information. Tx duration was assessed by descriptive medians or KMestimates. Biopsies at afatinib resistance were not required in LL3/6/7. Results: Of the 553 pts with common EGFR mutations who received 1st‐line afatinib and later discontinued it, 2nd‐line therapy was given in 394 (71%) pts and consisted of platinum‐based CT for 252 (46%), single agent CT for 39 (7%), 1st‐generation EGFR TKI for 49 (9%) and other tx for 54 (10%) pts. Median time on 2nd‐line tx was 2.9 months for platinum‐based and 1.4 months for single‐agent CT, with no relevant difference between Del19 and L858R mutation subgroups. Among 186 (34%) pts who received 1st‐generation EGFR TKIs post‐afatinib, median time on tx was 3.9 months. Of 212 pts randomised to 1st‐line CT in LL3 and LL6, 117 (55%) received 1st‐generation EGFR TKI monotherapy as 2nd‐line tx, with a median time on tx of 11.2 months. Interestingly, 34 pts received osimertinib after 1st‐line afatinib, the majority in ≥3rd line; median time on osimertinib tx was 31.5 months (95% CI 16.8‐31.5 months). Median OS for osimertinib‐treated pts is not yet evaluable. Conclusions: The majority (71%) of pts who received 1st‐line afatinib were fit enough to receive subsequent therapies and there was no relevant difference in 2nd‐line tx duration by Del19/L858R EGFR mutation subgroup. Introduction of a different TKI was common, with good outcome. Time on tx with osimertinib after afatinib was unexpectedly long among 34 pts; this should be examined in a larger cohort. Overall, these findings suggest that pts treated with 1st‐line afatinib are well suited for subsequent therapies, including CT, 1st‐generation EGFR TKIs and osimertinib.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sequist, L., Wu, Y.-L., Schuler, M., Kato, T., Yang, J. C.-H., Tanaka, H., … Nakagawa, K. (2017). Subsequent therapies post-afatinib among patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC in LUX-Lung (LL) 3, 6 and 7. Annals of Oncology, 28, v482–v483. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx380.051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free