Comment on "seroevidence for H5N1 influenza infections in humans: Meta-analysis"

18Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A better understanding of the severity of H5N1 in humans is needed. Wang et al. (Brevia, 23 March 2012, p. 1463; published online 23 February 2012) overinterpret the results of seroprevalence studies and take too little account of underlying uncertainties. Although the true risk of death from H5N1 infection will likely be lower than the 60% of reported laboratory-confirmed cases, there is little evidence of millions of missed infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Kerkhove, M. D., Riley, S., Lipsitch, M., Guan, Y., Monto, A. S., Webster, R. G., … Ferguson, N. M. (2012, June 22). Comment on “seroevidence for H5N1 influenza infections in humans: Meta-analysis.” Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221434

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free