F.03 Timing of incidence and recovery of delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma resection: insight into mechanisms

  • Cháng S
  • Despot I
  • Dong C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Delayed facial palsy (DFP) after resection of vestibular schwannomas (VS) is described as worsening of facial nerve function after a normal postoperative result. Several mechanisms have been postulated to explain this phenomenon, although none satisfactorily explain all of its features. Furthermore, systematic documentation of recovery rates is lacking. Methods: 403 consecutive cases of VS resection between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients with preoperative facial palsy were excluded. Patients developing significant facial palsy (HB grade ≥ 3) were categorized into groups based on timing of onset: immediate facial palsy (IFP), “early-onset” DFP (within 48 h), and “late-onset” DFP (after 48 h). IFP patients were subdivided into “minor” (HB grade 3) and “major” (HB grade≥4) groups. These groups were compared with respect to demographics, intraoperative data, and recovery. Results: The late-onset DFP group demonstrated the quickest recovery to HB≤2 (2.9 weeks), followed by the minor IFP group (8.5 weeks), then the early-onset DFP group (53 weeks). Major IFP group exhibited the poorest recovery with only 32% recovering to HB grade≤2 within one year. Conclusions: The bimodal distribution in recovery time in delayed facial palsy patients implies separate underlying phenomena. We propose that a delayed demyelination of the facial nerve occurs in late-onset DFP, and best explains the uniformly rapid recovery observed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cháng, S., Despot, I., Dong, C., Westerberg, B., & Akagami, R. (2016). F.03 Timing of incidence and recovery of delayed facial palsy after vestibular schwannoma resection: insight into mechanisms. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 43(S2), S19–S19. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.98

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free