Management of recto-vaginal fistulas after prosthetic reinforcement treatment for pelvic organ prolapse

16Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To communicate our findings on successful treatment of recto-vaginal fistulas (RVFs) after prosthetic reinforcement surgery of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: A retrospective single center study between 1998 and 2008 was performed. A total of 80 patients with RVF were identified, of which five patients (6%), with a mean age of 65 years (range: 52-73), had undergone previous surgery for POP with prosthetic reinforcement. RESULTS: All patients complained about ongoing vaginal infections and febrile episodes. These symptoms were reported after a mean period of 18 mo after POP repair. As a first intervention, three patients underwent ablation of the prosthetic material (PM). As a second intervention, open proctectomy with a primary anastomosis, an omental patch, and a protective ileostomy were performed in two patients. One patient required a terminal colostomy due to complete destruction of the anal sphincters. In two other patients, ablation of the PM and proctectomy was performed as a one-step procedure. The postoperative course in all patients was uneventful, with a mean length of hospitalization of 20 d (range: 15-30). Closure of the ileostomy was achieved in all four patients within four months. After a mean period of 35 mo (range: 4-60) of follow-up, no recurrence was observed with normal continence in four patients. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the definitive treatment of high RVFs after PM repair for POP necessitates ablation of the PM, proctectomy with a primary colorectal anastomosis, an omental patch interposition, and a temporary ileostomy. © 2010 Baishideng.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ouaïssi, M., Cresti, S., Giger, U., Sielezneff, I., Pirrò, N., Berthet, B., … Sastre, B. (2010). Management of recto-vaginal fistulas after prosthetic reinforcement treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 16(24), 3011–3015. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i24.3011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free