Initial validity and reliability testing of the SGBA-5

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background A growing body of research indicates that sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) influence health through a variety of distinct mechanisms. Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis (SGBA) techniques could examine these influences, however, there is a lack of nuanced and easily implementable measurement tools for health research. To address this gap, we created the Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Tool – 5 item (SGBA-5). Objectives This research aims to assess the validity and reliability of the SGBA-5 for use in health sciences research where sex or gender are not primary variables of interest. Methods A Delphi consensus study was conducted with Canadian researchers (n=14). The Delphi experts rated the validity of each SGBA-5 item on a 5-point Likert scale each round, receiving summary statistics of other experts’ responses after the first round. A conservative threshold for consensus agreement (75% rating an item 4+ of 5) was used given the novelty of this scale’s items. Reliability was assessed through a twoarmed test-retest study. The university student arm (n=89) was conducted in-person (on paper), and the older adult arm (n=71) was conducted online (digitally). Results The Delphi study ended after three rounds; experts reached consensus agreement on the validity of the biological sex item of the SGBA-5 (93%) and consensus non-agreement on each of the gendered aspect of health items (identity: 64%, expression: 64%, roles: 50%, relations: 57%). Both the student arm (sex item: κ = 1.00, 95% CI(1.00, 1.00), gendered items: ICC(A,1) ≥ .899, 95% CI(.851, .933)) and the older adult arm (sex item: κ = 1.00, 95% CI(1.00, 1.00), gendered items: ICC(A,1) ≥ .865, 95% CI(.772, .920)) of the test-retest study indicated that all items were reliable. Conclusions The novel SGBA-5 tool demonstrated reliability across all scale items and validity of the biological sex item. The gendered aspects of health items may be valid. Future research can further develop the SGBA-5 as a tool for use in health research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Putman, A., Cole, A., & Dogra, S. (2025). Initial validity and reliability testing of the SGBA-5. PLoS ONE, 20(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free