Evaluating a measure of social health derived from two mental health recovery measures: The California quality of life (CA-QOL) and mental health statistics improvement program consumer survey (MHSIP)

18Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Social health is important to measure when assessing outcomes in community mental health. Our objective was to validate social health scales using items from two broader commonly used measures that assess mental health outcomes. Participants were 609 adults receiving psychological treatment services. Items were identified from the California Quality of Life (CA-QOL) and Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) outcome measures by their conceptual correspondence with social health and compared to the Social Functioning Questionnaire (SFQ) using correlational analyses. Pearson correlations for the identified CA-QOL and MSHIP items with the SFQ ranged from .42 to .62, and the identified scale scores produced Pearson correlation coefficients of .56, .70, and, .70 with the SFQ. Concurrent validity with social health was supported for the identified scales. The current inclusion of these assessment tools allows community mental health programs to include social health in their assessments. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carlson, J. A., Sarkin, A. J., Levack, A. E., Sklar, M., Tally, S. R., Gilmer, T. P., & Groessl, E. J. (2011). Evaluating a measure of social health derived from two mental health recovery measures: The California quality of life (CA-QOL) and mental health statistics improvement program consumer survey (MHSIP). Community Mental Health Journal, 47(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9347-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free