The Minimum Values of (RR-PQ) for High Quality Coronary CT Angiogram in Half, Automatic Patient's Motion Correction (APMC) and Full Reconstruction Using 320-ADCT (0.275 s/r)

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A clear coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can be obtained when temporal resolution (TR) is shorter than slow filling (SF) duration. The SF duration was calculated by the following equation: SF=-443+0.742 (RR-PQ). Although, the TR of half and full reconstruction using 320-ADCT (0.275 s/r) are known, the TR of automatic patient motion correction (APMC) reconstruction is not clear. The purpose of this study is to clarify the each minimum value of (RR-PQ) for acquiring a clear CCTA that was made by half, full or APMC reconstruction. METHOD: CCTA was performed in consecutive 345 (M/F=195/150, Age: 69±10 years) patients except for arrhythmia and the final heart rate (controlled by β-blocker) ≥80 bpm using 320-ADCT (Aquilion ONE, 0.275 s/r). In all subjects, 3 CCTAs were generated by half, full, or APMC reconstruction at the same optimal phase. Image quality (A: excellent, B: acceptable, C: poor) was estimated by the consensus of three trained researchers. We classified (RR-PQ) into 15 groups by each 50 ms interval. RESULTS: The A or B % prediction (y) significantly correlated (y=-240.08+0.401x, r=0.98, p=0.0006 in half, y=-238.26+0.378x, r=0.98, p=0.0001 in APMC, and y=-236.84+0.332x, r=0.97, p<0.0001 in full reconstruction) with (RR-PQ) (x), respectively. CONCLUSION: The minimum values of (RR-PQ) for 95% prediction of A or B image quality were ≥836 ms in half, ≥881 ms in APMC, and ≥998 ms in full reconstruction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takayanagi, T., Sekine, T., Kondo, T., Amanuma, M., Sano, T., Ishizaka, K., … Takase, S. (2016). The Minimum Values of (RR-PQ) for High Quality Coronary CT Angiogram in Half, Automatic Patient’s Motion Correction (APMC) and Full Reconstruction Using 320-ADCT (0.275 s/r). Nihon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, 72(6), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2016_JSRT_72.6.496

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free