The culturo-techno-contextual approach and students' understanding of computer science education in a developing economy

7Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The lecture method has been compared with teaching methods such as flip learning, cooperative learning and simulations to establish which holds the key to students' understanding of concepts. What is bereft in the education literature is its comparative efficiency with the culturo-techno contextual approach (CTCA) in the teaching of computer science education. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted the quasi-experimental design to determine the efficacy of the CTCA in breaking difficulties related to the study of spreadsheets as a difficult concept in the Nigerian computer science education curriculum. Junior high school students studying computer science education participated in the study. The control group had 30 students, with 35 students in the experimental group. The experimental group was taught using CTCA, while the control group used the lecture method. The spread sheet achievement test, which had 40 items on spreadsheet, was used to collect data. Findings: The results showed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group [F (1,60) = 41.89; p < 0.05]. The findings showed the potential of CTCA in improving students' performance in spreadsheets in the computer science education curriculum. Originality/value: The originality of this study is hinged on its ground-breaking test of the CTCA to the study of the spreadsheet. The findings of this study indicate its efficacy in improving students' understanding of spreadsheet and computer science education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdulhadi, M., Awaah, F., Agbanimu, D., Ekwam, E. O., & Heloo, E. S. (2024). The culturo-techno-contextual approach and students’ understanding of computer science education in a developing economy. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 17(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2022-0087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free