Comparison of three software programs for three-dimensional graphic imaging as contrasted with operative findings

25Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Several types of practical three-dimensional (3D) imaging software programs are available, including those attached to computed tomographic devices. Three different software programs (Advantage Workstation Volume Share 4, OsiriX and CTTRY) were used to generate 3D images on the basis of imaging data obtained by 64-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in the same patient. Methods: Surgery was then performed referring to these 3D images in five patients. The characteristics, advantages, disadvantages and utility in the operative field of the images generated with each software program were compared with respect to actual operative findings. Results: There were no marked differences in vascular images at the segmental level among the software programs, and all three were considered useful for surgery. However, vascular images at the subsegmental level differed among the three programs. Conclusions: The depiction of blood vessels at the subsegmental level lacked accuracy when compared with operative findings. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsumoto, T., Kanzaki, M., Amiki, M., Shimizu, T., Maeda, H., Sakamoto, K., … Onuki, T. (2012). Comparison of three software programs for three-dimensional graphic imaging as contrasted with operative findings. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 41(5), 1098–1103. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezr152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free