Post-transplant nephrotic syndrome: A comprehensive clinicopathologic study

56Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Post-transplant (Tx) nephrotic syndrome (NS) is not well defined. Methods. Seventy-four renal transplant recipients with NS were studied. Results. Biopsies showed chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in 31 patients; recurrent glomerular disease (GN) in 15, de novo GN in 18, and undetermined GN in 9. NS developed 0.25 to 384 months post-Tx and was treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in 18 patients; calcium channel blockers in 25; or both drugs in 31. NS remitted in 24% of cases 2 to 28 months after onset, and this persisted in all except 3 patients. The remission rate was lowest (9%) for CAN and highest (47%) for de novo GN. Compared with persistent NS, those with remission showed higher prevalence of de novo GN (53% vs. 17%), lower prevalence of CAN (18% vs. 50%), earlier onset of NS (39 vs. 59 months), lower serum SCr at onset (2.3 vs. 2.9 mg/dL), and higher incidence of treatment with ACE or ARB. The 5-year graft loss rates for CAN, recurrent and de novo GN were 57%, 36%, and 23%, respectively. Compared with the functioning grafts, the failed grafts showed higher prevalence of CAN (60% vs. 16%), lower prevalence of de novo GN (12% vs. 46%), earlier onset of NS (47 vs 65 months post-Tx), higher serum SCr at onset (3.3 vs. 2.0 mg/dL), lower prevalence of remission of NS (5% vs. 48%), and higher proteinuria at follow-up (5.1 vs. 2.5 g/day). Graft survival improved with NS remission (88% vs. 18%). Conclusion. Post-Tx NS displays distinctive clinicopathologic features with pathogenetic and therapeutic implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yakupoglu, U., Baranowska-Daca, E., Rosen, D., Barrios, R., Suki, W. N., & Truong, L. D. (2004). Post-transplant nephrotic syndrome: A comprehensive clinicopathologic study. Kidney International, 65(6), 2360–2370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00655.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free