Explaining Unfair Offers in Ultimatum Games and their Effects on Trust: An Experimental Approach

  • De Cremer D
  • van Dijk E
  • Pillutla M
38Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Unfair offers in bargaining may have disruptive effects because they may reduce interpersonal trust. In such situations future trust may be strongly affected by social accounts (i.e., apologies vs. denials). In the current paper we investigate when people are most likely to demand social accounts for the unfair offer (Experiment 1), and when social accounts will have the highest impact (Experiment 2). We hypothesized that the need for and impact of social accounts will be highest when the intentions of the other party are uncertain. The results provided support for this reasoning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Cremer, D., van Dijk, E., & Pillutla, M. M. (2010). Explaining Unfair Offers in Ultimatum Games and their Effects on Trust: An Experimental Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20102018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free