Comparison of caudal and intravenous clonidine in the prevention of agitation after sevoflurance in children

91Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. In children, sevoflurane anaesthesia is associated with postanaesthetic agitation, which is treated mainly with opioids. We compared the effectiveness of epidural and i.v. clonidine in the prevention of this postanaesthetic agitation. Methods. Eighty children aged 3-8 yr (ASA I-II) received standardized general anaesthesia with inhaled sevoflurane and caudal epidural block with 0.175% bupivacaine I ml kg-1 for minor surgery. The children were assigned randomly to four groups: (I) clonidine I μg kg-1 added to caudal bupivacaine; (II) clonidine 3 μg kg-1 added to caudal bupivacaine; (III) clonidine 3 μg kg-1 i.v. and caudal bupivacaine; and (IV) caudal block with bupivacaine, no clonidine (control). A blinded observer assessed the behaviour of the children during the first postoperative hour. Secondary end-points were the time to fitness for discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit, and haemodynamic and respiratory variables. Results. The incidence of agitation was 22, 0, 5 and 39% in groups I, II, III and IV respectively (P<0.05 for groups II and III compared with group IV). During the first hour after surgery, patients in groups II and III had significantly lower scores for agitation than group IV patients. Time to fitness for discharge did not differ between the four groups. Conclusions. Clonidine 3 μg kg-1 prevented agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia, independently of the route of administration. The effect of clonidine appears to be dose-dependent, as an epidural dose of 1 μg kg-1 failed to reduce it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bock, M., Kunz, P., Schreckenberger, R., Graf, B. M., Martin, E., & Motsch, J. (2002). Comparison of caudal and intravenous clonidine in the prevention of agitation after sevoflurance in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 88(6), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/88.6.790

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free