Comment on "Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions" by Ocko and Hamburg (2022)

Abstract

In this commentary, we provide additional context for Ocko and Hamburg (2022) related to the climate consequences of replacing fossil fuels with clean hydrogen alternatives. We first provide a tutorial for the derivations of underlying differential equations that describe the radiative forcing of hydrogen emissions, which differ slightly from equations relied on by previous studies. Ocko and Hamburg (2022) defined a metric based on time-integrated radiative forcing from continuous emissions. To complement their analysis, we further present results for temperature and radiative forcing over the next centuries for unit pulse and continuous emissions scenarios. Our results are qualitatively consistent with previous studies, including Ocko and Hamburg (2022). Our results clearly show that for the same quantity of emissions, hydrogen shows a consistently smaller climate impact than methane. As with other short-lived species, the radiative forcing from a continuous emission of hydrogen is proportional to emission rates, whereas the radiative forcing from a continuous emission of carbon dioxide is closely related to cumulative emissions. After a cessation of hydrogen emissions, the Earth cools rapidly, whereas after a cessation of carbon dioxide emissions, the Earth continues to warm somewhat and remains warm for many centuries. Regardless, our results support the conclusion of Ocko and Hamburg (2022) that, if methane were a feedstock for hydrogen production, any possible near-term consequences will depend primarily on methane leakage and secondarily on hydrogen leakage.