A multicenter study of romiplostim for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies

76Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) frequently complicates cancer treatment causing chemotherapy treatment delays, dose reductions, and discontinuation. There is no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agent available to manage CIT. This study retrospectively evaluated patients with CIT treated on institutional romiplostim treatment pathways at four US centers. The primary outcome was achievement of a romiplostim response (median on-romiplostim platelet count ≥75x109/L and ≥30x109/L above baseline). Secondary outcomes included time to platelet count ≥100x109/L and rates of the following: platelet count <100×109/L, platelet count <75x109/L, platelet count <50x109/L, thrombocytosis, chemotherapy dose reduction/treatment delay, platelet transfusion, bleeding, and thromboembolism. Multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of romiplostim non-response and compare weekly dosing with intracycle/intermittent dosing. A total of 173 patients (153 solid tumor, 20 lymphoma or myeloma) were treated, with 170 (98%) receiving a median of four (range: 1-36) additional chemotherapy cycles on romiplostim. Romiplostim was effective in solid tumor patients: 71% of patients achieved a romiplostim response, 79% avoided chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays, and 89% avoided platelet transfusions. Median per-patient platelet count on romiplostim was significantly higher than baseline (116x109/L vs. 60x109/L; P<0.001). Bone marrow (BM) tumor invasion, prior pelvic irradiation, and prior temozolomide exposure predicted romiplostim non-response. Bleeding rates were lower than historical CIT cohorts and thrombosis rates were not elevated. Weekly dosing was superior to intracycle dosing with higher response rates and less chemotherapy dose reductions/treatment delays/bleeding; intracycle dosing had an incidence rate ratio (IRR) for dose reduction/treatment delay of 3.00 (95%CI: 1.30-6.91; P=0.010) and an IRR for bleeding of 4.84 (95%CI: 1.18-19.89, P=0.029) compared with weekly dosing. Blunted response (10% response rate) was seen in non-myeloid hematologic malignancy patients with BM involvement. In conclusion, romiplostim was safe and effective for CIT in most solid tumor patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Samkari, H., Parnes, A. D., Goodarzi, K., Weitzman, J. I., Connors, J. M., & Kuter, D. J. (2021). A multicenter study of romiplostim for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Haematologica, 106(4), 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.251900

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free