Hydration with sodium bicarbonate does not prevent contrast nephropathy: A multicenter clinical trial

25Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Radiographic contrast media exposition can cause acute renal function impairment. There is limited and conflicting evidence that hydration with sodium bicarbonate prevents contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Objective: The present study was aimed at determining whether sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with saline to prevent nephropathy in patients at risk undergoing cardiac catheterization. Methods: Three hundred and one patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention with serum creatinine ≥ 1.2mg/dL or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 50ml/min were randomized to receive hydration with sodium bicarbonate starting 1 hour before the procedure and 6 hours after the procedure, or hydration with 0.9% saline. CIN was defined as an increase of 0.5mg/dL in creatinine in 48h Results: Eighteen patients (5.9%) developed contrast induced nephropathy: 9 patients in the bicarbonate group (6.1%) and 9 patients in the saline group (6.0%), p = 0.97. The change in serum creatinine was similar in both groups, 0.01 ± 0.26 mg/dL in the bicarbonate group and 0.01 ± 0.35 mg/dL in the saline group, p = 0.9. No statistical difference was observed between the change in glomerular filtration rate (0.89 ± 9 ml/min vs. 2.29 ± 10 ml/min, p = 0.2 bicarbonate group and saline group, respectively). Conclusion: Hydration with sodium bicarbonate was not superior to saline to prevent contrast media induced nephropathy in patients at risk undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomes, V. O., Lasevitch, R., Lima, V. C., Brito, F. S., Perez-Alva, J. C., Moulin, B., … Caramori, P. (2012). Hydration with sodium bicarbonate does not prevent contrast nephropathy: A multicenter clinical trial. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 99(6), 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2012005000108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free