Comparing different CFD software with NACA 2412 airfoil

7Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The engineering application's design process starts with a concept, based on our theoretical knowledge and continues with a numerical simulation. In our paper, we review the finite volume method (FVM) which is used generally for heat and fluid dynamic simulations. We compare three different computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software (based in the fine volume method) for validating a NACA airfoil, which can be used for example in the aerospace industry for an airplane's wing profile, and it can be used for example in the renewable industry for a wind turbine's blade or a water turbine's impeller profile. At the end of this paper, the result of our simulations will be compared with a validation case and the difference between the CFD software and the measured data will be presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hetyei, C., Molnar, I., & Szlivka, F. (2020). Comparing different CFD software with NACA 2412 airfoil. Progress in Agricultural Engineering Sciences, 16(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1556/446.2020.00004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free