Analyzing gender gaps in bicameral legislatures: How asymmetrical institutions affect the supply and demand for female candidates

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In bicameral legislatures, gender representation varies significantly between chambers. Historically, Japan's upper house has maintained a proportion of women twice that of the lower house. However, electoral systems alone cannot fully explain this disparity. We argue that seemingly gender-neutral legislative institutions influence both voting behavior and candidates' willingness to run, contributing to significant disparities in gender representation in bicameral legislatures. To test this argument, we conduct two survey experiments exploring the underlying mechanisms from the perspectives of voters and candidates. Our findings suggest that informing voters about the upper house's subordinate role increases support for female candidates in upper house elections. Furthermore, women display a greater willingness to pursue office when assured of job security in the upper house, while men exhibit less interest when made aware of its limited authority to appoint the prime minister. This study enhances our current understanding of the effects of asymmetrical institutions between chambers from a gender perspective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ono, Y., Kasuya, Y., & Miwa, H. (2025). Analyzing gender gaps in bicameral legislatures: How asymmetrical institutions affect the supply and demand for female candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free