Effects of forage provision to young calves on rumen fermentation and development of the gastrointestinal tract

158Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fifteen Holstein male calves were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatments according to age and body weight (BW) to determine the effects of feeding different forages sources on rumen fermentation and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development. Treatments consisted of a starter (20% crude protein, 21% neutral detergent fiber) fed alone (CON) or supplemented with alfalfa (AH) or with oat hay (OH). All calves received 2. L of milk replacer (MR) at 12.5% dry matter twice daily until 49 d of age. Calves received 2. L of the same MR from 50 to 56 d of age and were weaned at 57 d of age. Individual starter, forage, and MR intakes were recorded daily and BW was recorded weekly. A rumen sample was taken weekly to determine rumen pH and volatile fatty acid concentrations. Three weeks after weaning, animals were harvested and each anatomical part of the GIT was separated and weighed with and without contents. Rumen pH was lower in CON than in OH and AH calves. Furthermore, acetate proportion in the rumen liquid tended to be greater in AH than in CON and OH treatments. Total GIT weight, expressed as a percentage of BW, tended to be greater in AH compared with the other 2 treatments. Rumen tissue tended to weigh more in CON than in OH animals. Animals with access to forage tended to have a greater expression of monocarboxylate transporter 1 than CON calves. In conclusion, calves supplemented with oat hay have a better rumen environment than calves offered no forage and do not have an increased gut fill. © 2013 American Dairy Science Association.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castells, L., Bach, A., Aris, A., & Terré, M. (2013). Effects of forage provision to young calves on rumen fermentation and development of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(8), 5226–5236. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free