The multidimensional perturbation value: A single metric to measure similarity and activity of treatments in high-throughput multidimensional screens

29Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Screens using high-throughput, information-rich technologies such as microarrays, high-content screening (HCS), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have become increasingly widespread. Compared with single-readout assays, these methods produce a more comprehensive picture of the effects of screened treatments. However, interpreting such multidimensional readouts is challenging. Univariate statistics such as t-tests and Z-factors cannot easily be applied to multidimensional profiles, leaving no obvious way to answer common screening questions such as "Is treatment X active in this assay?" and "Is treatment X different from (or equivalent to) treatment Y?" We have developed a simple, straightforward metric, the multidimensional perturbation value (mp-value), which can be used to answer these questions. Here, we demonstrate application of the mp-value to three data sets: a multiplexed gene expression screen of compounds and genomic reagents, a microarray-based gene expression screen of compounds, and an HCS compound screen. In all data sets, active treatments were successfully identified using the mp-value, and simulations and follow-up analyses supported the mp-value's statistical and biological validity. We believe the mp-value represents a promising way to simplify the analysis of multidimensional data while taking full advantage of its richness. © 2012 Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hutz, J. E., Nelson, T., Wu, H., McAllister, G., Moutsatsos, I., Jaeger, S. A., … Selinger, D. W. (2013). The multidimensional perturbation value: A single metric to measure similarity and activity of treatments in high-throughput multidimensional screens. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 18(4), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057112469257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free